EldoS | Feel safer!

Software components for data protection, secure storage and transfer

Socket / MMF / DIR benchmark

Also by EldoS: CallbackRegistry
A component to monitor and control Windows registry access and create virtual registry keys.
Posted: 09/20/2011 08:40:25
by Henrik Lyder (Standard support level)
Joined: 02/02/2010
Posts: 8

I have an application deployed which originally was designed to run over a network using a socket transport. I now realize that most of my users are actually deploying to same computer and using the loop-back ip address. I was wondering if I should rewrite the transport to include support for MMF or DIR. Can someone please give me the pro/con on doing this...

More reliable?

Regards and thanks

Henrik Lyder
Posted: 09/20/2011 09:40:43
by Eugene Mayevski (EldoS Corp.)

MMF transport is indeed faster than socket transport. Direct transport is suitable only for in-process (cross-thread) communications, and MMF transport is fine for cross-process communication as well. So yes, adding MMF transport is a good idea if you have some time to invest in adding it.

Sincerely yours
Eugene Mayevski



Topic viewed 2325 times

Number of guests: 1, registered members: 0, in total hidden: 0


Back to top

As of July 15, 2016 EldoS Corporation will operate as a division of /n software inc. For more information, please read the announcement.

Got it!