EldoS | Feel safer!

Software components for data protection, secure storage and transfer

\\.\PhysicalDrive0 vs. \??\PhysicalDrive0

Also by EldoS: SecureBlackbox
200+ components and classes for digital security, signing, encryption and secure networking.
#11085
Posted: 09/17/2009 09:20:31
by Ken J. Lafredo (Priority Standard support level)
Joined: 09/14/2009
Posts: 2

Hi,

Why do you require physical volume names are "\??\PhysicalDrive0" instead of the standard Windows "\\.\PhysicalDrive0". This causes unnecessary conversion in code. I would hope that at least you could support both.

thanks
#11086
Posted: 09/17/2009 09:45:57
by Volodymyr Zinin (EldoS Corp.)

Hi,

This is because storage/link names can also be located in other than "\??" object manager's directories and therefore can't be accessible via win32 path "\\.\".
But it's a good idea to support this path too. I think we will add it in future releases.
Thank you.

Reply

Statistics

Topic viewed 4013 times

Number of guests: 1, registered members: 0, in total hidden: 0




|

Back to top

As of July 15, 2016 EldoS Corporation will operate as a division of /n software inc. For more information, please read the announcement.

Got it!